Ex Parte Melof
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
735 So.2d 1172 (1999)
Ex parte Fred MELOF et al.
(In re Fred Melof, et al. v. Fob James, et al.).
1971900.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
May 28, 1999.
Charles A. Dauphin and Elizabeth L. Wood of Baxley, Dillard, Dauphin & McKnight, Birmingham, for petitioners.
Ron Bowdon, counsel, Department of Revenue, and asst. atty. gen.; and Mark Griffin, asst. counsel, Department of Revenue, and asst. atty. gen., for respondent Commissioner of Revenue for the State of Alabama.
HOUSTON, Justice.
This case presents the question whether Alabama's retirement-benefit taxation classifications conflict with Amendment 25 to…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence · Brown; Concurrence · Kennedy.
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Tolbert v. TolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Morris v. Wallace Community College-SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.