Legal Opinion

Town of Pine Bluffs v. Eisele

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2017No. S-17-0027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] The Town of Pine Bluffs owns and operates a day care facility, Laramie County taxed the facility based upon its conclusion that it was not used primarily for a governmental purpose. The Town sought an injunction in Laramie County District Court. That court dismissed the complaint, finding that the Town failed to exhaust administrative remedies available to it. Although we do so on a different basis than the district court, we affirm.

ISSUES PRESENTED

[¶2] We have reorganized and restated the issues raised by the parties as follows:

1. Must a taxpayer exhaust administrative…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted AdekaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Appeal of Pine Bluffs v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. FH v. State (In re Interest of ECH)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Archer v. State ex rel. Wyo. Dep't of Transp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State of Wyoming v. Uinta County AssessorWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Trudy L. Eisele, Laramie County Treasurer and Kenneth Guille, Laramie County Assessor v. The Town of Pine BluffsWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Montierth v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API