Legal Opinion
Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided March 12, 1971No. C.D. 4186PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Newman, Judge:
Plaintiffs protest the rate of duty imposed by the collector of customs at the port of New York on certain bicycles imported from England on June 6, 1961. These bicycles are the so-called large-wheel lightweight type, viz., with wheels over 25 inches in diameter, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without acessories. *156and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches.
The shipment in question was assessed at the rate of 11% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by Presidential Proclamation No.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Guy W. Capps, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Guy W. Capps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aimcee Wholesale Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. of Interco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. BlockUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982