Legal Opinion

Hand v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint. The action was begun in the Supreme Court of the state of New York, and was removed to this court, upon the petition of defendants, on the ground that the controversy involved a substantial federal question, to wit, the construction and effect of the Sheman Anti-' Trust Law (15 USCA §§ 1-7,15) and Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730).

Defendants now move to dismiss the complaint upon the following grounds: “Pirst, that the state court did not have jurisdiction of the action, and that this court acquired none on removal here; and, secondly,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Decorative Stone Co. v. Building Trades Council of Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Meyer v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Raymond R. Repp v. F. E. L. Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Schwarz v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API