Legal Opinion
Schwarz v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 18, 1940No. 199, 200PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
Two appeals have been consolidated for hearing. The service of summons in each of two actions brought in the District Court for the Southern District of New York was vacated and the actions dis missed. As nothing turns upon any distinction between the actions, what is hereinafter said in respect to the cause in which appellant is the sole plaintiff will suffice also to dispose of the appeal in the action in which his wife is joined as a party plaintiff. Both of them are residents of the Southern District of New York.
Ralph J. Schwarz was for many years a stockholder,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cowley v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles F. Leahy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Murphree v. Mississippi Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- E/M Lubricants, Inc. v. Microfral, S. A. R. L.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- USHA Holdings, LLC v. Franchise India Holdings Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- O'Leary v. LoftinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.