Legal Opinion
Maib v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 23, 2011No. Civil Action 09-1261 (RWR)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs George Maib, Robyn Maib, and Ocean Concrete, Inc. bring this action against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as the receiver of the Columbian Bank & Trust Company (“CB & T.”), alleging four causes of action based upon disputes over a loan between the plaintiffs and CB & T. The FDIC has moved to dismiss the complaint. Because the complaint fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted, the motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
George Maib is the principal officer, director, and shareholder of Ocean Concrete.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Magliore v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Cordoba Initiative Corporation v. DeakDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- William Penn Apartments, L.P. v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.