Legal Opinion
Richard v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 27, 2002No. CIV.A.96-2168(RMU), CIV.A.99-2380(RMU)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying in Part and Granting in Part the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Claims of Plaintiff Denise Walton
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
These race-discrimination and' retaliation cases began with 132 current and former employees of Bell Atlantic Corp. (now Verizon) suing their employer and its subsidiaries (collectively, “the defendants” or “Bell Atlantic”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Although the court has not consolidated these two cases, they have been…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lester v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Bryant v. BrownleeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Singh v. United States House of Representatives, Committee on Ways & MeansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- HOLMES-MARTIN v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.