Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1928No. Docket No. 3469PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon the defendant’s application for a writ of supersedeas, and also for an order directing the superior court of the county of Yuba to release the defendant from the custody of the sheriff of said county.

On the twenty-first day of October, 1927, the superior court of said county entered its order, and on the twenty-fourth day of October, 1927, entered a final decree of divorce in the above-entitled cause, by the terms of which order, and also by the terms of said final decree, the above-named defendant was required to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $175 per month as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ex parte OverendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Messenkop v. DuffieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Chadwick v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Erickson v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API