Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Chadwick

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1928No. Docket No. 3659PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

In this action both parties have appealed from that portion of the judgment considered adverse to the interest of the party appealing. Both appeals are presented upon the same transcript and argued in the same briefs. For convenience, we will refer to the parties as “plaintiff” and “defendant,” just as the title to this cause appeared in the trial court.

The action was brought by the plaintiff to secure a divorce from the defendant and division of alleged community property, and involves the question of the validity of two certain agreements dated May 23, 1908. The action for divorce was begun…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Dimond v. SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Unser v. UnserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Collins v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cummins v. CumminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Migala v. DakinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. McDaniel v. McDanielNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API