Legal Opinion

Ex parte Overend

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1898No. Crim. No. 455PublishedCited by 12 opinions

HABEAS COB'PTJS to the Supreme Court to test the validity of an order of imprisonment for contempt of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

On the fifteenth day of June, 1898, in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, sitting with a jury impaneled for the purpose, one Minnie Campbell was being tried upon a charge of having obtained money by false pretenses from the petitioner herein, Alfred Overend. On the forenoon of that day the petitioner herein, Overend, was called as a witness for the prosecution on the said trial, and declined and refused to answer certain questions asked him by the prosecution, upon the ground that the answers would tend to convict him of a felony. The first question which he refused…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Adams v. Haskell & WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  3. In re HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Morelli v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. McComb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. In re HambergIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API