Legal Opinion

People v. Montgomery

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1942No. Crim. 3534PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appeal from an order refusing to assume jurisdiction to act in any way upon the motion of defendant to vacate the judgment of conviction while the appeal from such, judgment was pending.

Defendant was convicted of pandering. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by this court (Division One) September 29, 1941. While his appeal was pending he presented his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction on the following grounds: (1) that the indictment of defendant was returned by a grand jury consisting entirely of white persons while he was a negro; (2) that there had been a systematic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. TidwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. CostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API