Alonso v. Badger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendants to recover the value of some 548 head of lambs allegedly sold for the sum of $2,740. For reasons that will hereinafter appear, defendant Stanford filed a cross-complaint wherein he joined one John Montes as a party. The issues framed by the cross-complaint are not before us on this ap peal for the reason that cross-defendant Montes defaulted and judgment was entered against him and in favor of defendant and cross-complainant Stanford for $2,590. At the trial upon the issues raised by plaintiff’s complaint and defendants’ answer the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lusitanian-American Development Co. v. Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Hilmer v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Wong Foo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Stefani v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Giffen v. Selma Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roth v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Cerra v. BlackstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952