Legal Opinion

Alonso v. Badger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1943No. Civ. 13967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendants to recover the value of some 548 head of lambs allegedly sold for the sum of $2,740. For reasons that will hereinafter appear, defendant Stanford filed a cross-complaint wherein he joined one John Montes as a party. The issues framed by the cross-complaint are not before us on this ap peal for the reason that cross-defendant Montes defaulted and judgment was entered against him and in favor of defendant and cross-complainant Stanford for $2,590. At the trial upon the issues raised by plaintiff’s complaint and defendants’ answer the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lusitanian-American Development Co. v. Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hilmer v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wong Foo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Stefani v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Giffen v. Selma Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roth v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cerra v. BlackstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API