Legal Opinion
Lusitanian-American Development Co. v. Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1934No. Sac. 4818PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLUMMER, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff had judgment in this action for the sum of $8,585 against the defendants George W. Smith, Ella Smith, Jacob Kooyman, Peter Kooyman, W. Feinstein, John Kooyman, The Seaboard Dairy Credit Corporation, Ed Haeeker and Ord L. Leachman, for and on account of the alleged conversion of a certain herd of cattle. From this judgment the defendant Seaboard Dairy Credit Corporation appeals.
The record shows that prior to the fifteenth day of February, 1928, the plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate situate in the county of San Joaquin, and also of a certain herd…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Mier v. Southern California Ice Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- In Re CorreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Clark v. WhiteusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by28 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Henry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil SyndicateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.