Legal Opinion

Wright v. Herzog

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 10, 1943No. [No. 58, October Term, 1943.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.

This is a habeas corpus case. The lower court, in deciding it, held Section 80 of Article 41 of Flack’s Annotated Code of Maryland, 1939, to be unconstitutional. Under Section 16 of Article 42 of the Code, the judge sitting below was required to transmit his written opinion and the papers in the case to this court for review.

Donald J. Herzog, on March 20, 1934, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City, pleaded guilty to five indictments, four of which charged robbery with a deadly weapon and one larceny. In each of the robbery cases he was sentenced to a term of ten years in the Maryland…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Fleenor v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Arthur v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. People v. DudleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In re PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Swan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. In Re DearoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API