Christy v. Spring Valley Water Works
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the former decisions of the cause, referred to in the present opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This cause has been before the court on two former occasions. (68 Cal. 73; 84 Cal. 541.) The action is ejectment, and the plaintiff's title is derived from one Randall, to whom the land in question was allotted in an action of partition, entitled Randallv. Winter, brought by him against his co-tenants in the late twelfth district court, and in which the appellant herein was one of the defendants. The interlocutory decree in that action was rendered October 13, 1871, and the referee who was appointed under its provisions to make partition of the land involved in the action made his report to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Christy v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Christy v. Spring Valley Water-WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- Liles v. PittsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Owsley v. MatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilkerson v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Laist v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.