Legal Opinion

Christy v. Spring Valley Water-Works

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1890No. 12374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

1. On the former appeal, this court held that the,decision of the court below, which -was based upon evidence of a new title acquired by the defendant after answer filed in the proceedings for partition, but before the rendition of any interlocutory decree therein, ivas erroneous; that the judgment in partition was conclusive upon all the parties as to any title or claim held by them at the time of its rendition. (68 Cal. 76.)

At the last trial, the defendant introduced in evidence entries in the registry of actions showing that the trial of the partition proceeding began on August 15, 1871;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Christy v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christy v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Phillips v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hayes v. KhinooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API