Christy v. Spring Valley Water Works
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was commenced September 17,1880. The remaining facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
— Appeal from a judgment for defendant, and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action of ejectment tried by the court without a jury.
The motion was heard and decided upon a statement of the case proposed, amended, settled, and certified as required by subdivision 3 of section 659, Code of Civil Procedure. The grounds of the motion were: 1. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision; 2. The decision is against law; 3. Errors of law; and the statement contained specifications of the particulars in which the evidence was alleged to be insufficient, and of the particular…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morenhout v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Wade v. DerayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- De Uprey v. De UpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Secreto v. CarlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Belle v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Rose v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.