Legal Opinion

State v. Auman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1986No. C9-86-107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence obtained in a war-rantless search of respondent. The state contends the pretrial court erred in excluding the evidence either because respondent consented to the search, or the search was reasonable under the emergency exception.

FACTS

Respondent Richard Auman was charged with one felony count of possession of a schedule II controlled substance and one misdemeanor count of unlawful possession of a hypodermic syringe. At an omnibus hearing on December 5, 1985, two police officers related the circumstances…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. ProberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Calvin Vauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Halla-PoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. SchweichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Morris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API