Legal Opinion
State v. Halla-Poe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1991No. C0-90-1828PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Dorothy Halla-Poe was charged with three counts of violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1988) (driving under the influence of alcohol; driving with alcohol concentration of .10 or more; alcohol concentration of .10 or more as measured within two hours of driving). Appellant moved to dismiss the charges against her on the grounds her fourth amendment rights were violated by an unreasonable search and seizure. The trial court denied the motion. Subsequently, appellant pled not guilty, waived her right to a jury trial, and stipulated to the prosecution’s ease…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- City of Troy v. OhlingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.