Legal Opinion

State v. Schweich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1987No. C3-87-1005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order suppressing physical evidence of cocaine and drug paraphernalia and also suppressing appellant’s inculpatory statements admitting ownership of these items. The state attempted to introduce this evidence in connection with charges against respondent of possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia. After an omnibus hearing, the trial court found that the state had used deceit and misrepresentation to obtain respondent’s consent to a warrantless search of his apartment. Consequently, the trial court found respondent’s consent was invalid and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krause v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. ZamoraColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. BunceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. In Re the Welfare of J.W.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API