Pascucci v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Chief Judge.
In this appeal we must determine if the hearing officer erred in his determination that the petitioner’s herniated disc condition was not a new, additional or previously undiscovered condition which warranted a reopening of petitioner’s claim.
The petitioner claims that there has been a change in his condition or the discovery of a new undiagnosed condition which occurred after his prior petition for reopening was denied. The respondents claim the petitioner’s same lower back problems were litigated in the prior petition to reopen, and that his present petition is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Bonnin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Crocker v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Aetna Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Garrote v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- MANASSAS ICE AND FUEL CO. v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Lovitch v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.