Legal Opinion

Seitz v. Fulton National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1936No. Appeal, 381PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

A statutory demurrer to appellant’s statement of claim having been filed, the court below directed judgment to be entered against him. The appellee is a banking house and the Lancaster Provision Company had on deposit a sum of money which the bank applied to the Company’s overdue notes. This application was made two weeks before the Provision Company went bankrupt. It was alleged by appellant, the trustee in bankruptcy, that the funds on deposit were the proceeds of collections of accounts due the Provision Company while insolvent, and that their application to the overdue notes of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Winters v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Greene County v. Center TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Stevens v. Doylestown Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Framlau Corp. v. Delaware CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Delhi-Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Adler v. HelselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. MacE v. Senior Adult Activities CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API