Legal Opinion

Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Delhi-Warnock Building Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1947No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

In this action of assumpsit plaintiff’s statement of claim is patently defective in form. The court below deemed it also deficient in substance, sustained an affidavit of defense raising questions of law, and entered judgment in favor of defendants.

The statement avers that in certain prior proceedings there were “finally and conclusively determined and adjudicated” the following facts: That in the period between August 1, 1924 and March 1, 1929 plaintiff loaned sums of money aggregating $25,000 to Warnock Building Association and received in return the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winters v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Barclay v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Adler v. HelselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Swaney v. Georges Township Road DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. GLENN v. Point Park CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Snoparsky v. BAERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Fishkin v. Hi-Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API