Canas v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
An employer and its insurer appeal a Workers’ Compensation Court finding that an injured worker’s temporary total disability benefits were incorrectly computed and that the cost of a penile implant is a compensable medical procedure. We affirm in part, and in part reverse and remand.
The determinations were made by a majority of a three-judge Workers’ Compensation Court panel upon rehearing.
“In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support an award by the compensation court, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the successful party. The findings of fact…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- NC + Hybrids v. Growers Seed Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Interest of AMHNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Yount v. SeagerNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Johnston v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Hare v. Watts Trucking ServiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wilson v. MiskoNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- McVaney v. BAIRD, HOLM, McEACHENNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Design Data Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Interest of DMBNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.