Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Tidewater Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1943PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether one of several defendants in an action for wrongful death arising out of a joint tort may have still another joint tort-feasor brought in and made a party defendant for the purpose of enforcing contribution, when the plaintiff’s right of action against such other tort-feasor, originally subsisting, has been lost by the lapse of time. C. S. 160; Curlee v. Power Co., 205 N. C., 644, 172 S. E., 329. The law answers in the affirmative. 13 Am. Jur., 52; 18 C. J. S., 19.

The pertinent meaning of C. S., 618 is that in an action arising out of a joint tort wherein…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. GretakisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Hough v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Wilson v. . MassageeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Wilson v. MassageeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API