Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Rosenthal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 11, 1954PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The action is for contribution under the Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Law of 1952. L. 1952, c. 335, p. 1075, N. J. S. 24. :53A-1 et seq.

These are the circumstances: On October 22, 1950 Wynne Goldstein suffered personal injury as the result of a collision of an automobile operated by the defendant Irving Rosenthal and a motor bus of the plaintiff Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. She was an occupant of Rosenthal’s automobile, at his invitation. On May 22, 1951 she brought suit in the Superior Court against Rosenthal and the owners of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Watson v. MercerSupreme Court of the United States · 1834

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API