Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Philip

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 31, 1972No. 6203PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

This is a proposed third-party action under Rule 21 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure, RSA 491:App. R.21, by Sears, Roebuck & Company against A. C. Philip, Jr. The only question presented is whether the claimant’s injury resulted from any breach of Philip’s contract with Sears which would give rise to an implied agreement by Philip to indemnify Sears for any damages assessed against it in the main action.

The case arises as a result of suits instituted against Sears by Ethel M. and John B. O’Donnell for injuries suffered by Mrs. O’Donnell in a fall at the Sears store in Eaconia,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Pittsfield Cottonwear Manufacturing Co. v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  3. Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. F. A. Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  4. Scahill v. MiniterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Town of Hooksett School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Roland Bosse v. Litton Unit Handling Systems, Division of Litton Systems, Inc., Third Party v. Werner Associates, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Morrissette v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Bardwell Motor Inn, Inc. v. AccavalloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API