Legal Opinion
Jensen v. U-Haul Co. of Cal.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided December 11, 2017No. E065887PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCodrington, J.
*298I. INTRODUCTION
In this tort action, plaintiffs and respondents Virgil Jensen and Glenda Jensen contend that they suffered damages caused by a negligently maintained rental truck, which blew a tire while Virgil Jensen was driving it. Defendant and appellant U-Haul Co. of California (UHCA) appeals from the trial court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration. UHCA contends that plaintiffs are bound by the arbitration agreement in the rental contract, even though neither plaintiff is a party to that contract. We affirm the trial court's ruling.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Goldman v. KPMG, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Berman v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Peterson v. DevitaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
- Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Schultz v. Sinav Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.