Cochran v. Hasty
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs brought suit against the defendants seeking damages and a permanent injunction. The complaint was in two counts, one alleging the defendant had negligently caused or allowed water to back up on plaintiffs' land. The other count charged these same acts had been done wantonly. The jury returned a verdict against defendants for $2,000. The trial judge subsequently enjoined the defendants from allowing the water to encroach upon plaintiff's property. From the awarding of these damages the defendants appeal. We reverse and remand.
The dispositive issue is whether, in this instance,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Sasser v. DixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Eagle & Phœnix Manufacturing Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- City of Fairhope v. RaddcliffeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Citizens Bank & Sav. Co. v. Wolfe Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Easterling v. Awtrey Building Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.