Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1986No. 84-788PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether Alabama's one-year statute of limitations or its six-year statute applies to an action in which the plaintiff's theory of recovery was the common-law right of a lower property owner not to be injured by the interference of an upper owner with the natural drainage of water onto the lower property.

Plaintiff/appellant Billy E. Fisher and defendant/appellee Space of Pensacola, Inc., are adjoining property owners on Airport Boulevard in the city of Mobile. During 1975 or 1976, Space built a parking lot on its property that allegedly channeled…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Polly v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  4. Roundtree v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  3. In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. Easterling v. Awtrey Building Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Auburn's Gameday Center at Magnolia Corner Owners Association, Inc. v. MurrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API