Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether Alabama's one-year statute of limitations or its six-year statute applies to an action in which the plaintiff's theory of recovery was the common-law right of a lower property owner not to be injured by the interference of an upper owner with the natural drainage of water onto the lower property.
Plaintiff/appellant Billy E. Fisher and defendant/appellee Space of Pensacola, Inc., are adjoining property owners on Airport Boulevard in the city of Mobile. During 1975 or 1976, Space built a parking lot on its property that allegedly channeled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Polly v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Roundtree v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Easterling v. Awtrey Building Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Auburn's Gameday Center at Magnolia Corner Owners Association, Inc. v. MurrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.