Legal Opinion

Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. City of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 5, 1986No. 85-966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs AmSouth Bank, N.A., and Ava C. Festorazzi appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendants City of Mobile and Ray Sumlin Construction Company, Inc. We affirm.

The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on its determination that, under the undisputed facts, AmSouth's and Festorazzi's claims were barred by the one-year statute of limitations as a matter of law.

AmSouth and Festorazzi, as co-trustees, are the owners of a building in downtown Mobile, Alabama, which has been leased to Julius S. Goldstein and Sons, Inc., a retail…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. W.T. Ratliff Co., Inc. v. HenleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Pigford v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Pollard v. PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Lacey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyce v. CasseseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  3. Jefferies v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Sharpe v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Sharpe)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008
  5. Laird v. KittrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API