Legal Opinion

Sasser v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 1, 1973No. SC 134PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment granting defendant’s motion for a new trial, following a verdict and judgment thereon in favor of the plaintiff.

The main question in the case is whether the allegations and the proof supported an action of trespass or trespass on the case.

The trial court granted the motion for a new trial solely on the ground that it became convinced that the one-year statute of limitations, Tit. 7, § 26, applied instead of the six-year statute, Tit. 7, § 21.

It is settled in our law that an action of trespass on the case is governed by the statute of limitations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Sibley v. OdumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Sington v. Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. City of Fairhope v. RaddcliffeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. McKenzie v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. W.T. Ratliff Co., Inc. v. HenleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Archie v. Enterprise Hosp. & Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Eidson v. Johns-Ridout's Chapels, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API