Legal Opinion

Carlson v. F. A. Martoccio Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1930No. 27,605PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant, a corporation, appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Fritz G. Carlson at 10:30 a. m. on June 3, 1927, while riding a bicycle on a street intersection in Minneapolis was struck by an automobile truck owned by defendant and driven by one of its employes. Carlson died shortly thereafter as a result of the collision. The day was misty and the pavement was wet.

The main questions involved in the case are: Was the defendant guilty of negligence, and was deceased guilty of contributory negligence, which was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Sorenson v. SandersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Primock v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Coffman v. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Landy v. Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Peterson v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Nygren v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API