Landy v. Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff! appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict for $4,500.
Defendant operates a sash and door factory at the southeast corner of Bryant avenue and Twenty-ninth street, Minneapolis. The original frame part of the factory faces Twenty-ninth street. A new brick addition facing Bryant avenue contains defendant’s offices which are accessible from the avenue. The entrance from Twenty-ninth street consists of a small porch with steps, a balustrade on each side and a roof. This was the entrance to the offices prior to the construction of the new…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Hamilton v. Minneapolis Desk Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Ober v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gilbert v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Van Avery v. Platte Valley Land & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Hastings v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Murray v. Albert Lea Home Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- McIntyre v. HoltmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Carlson v. F. A. Martoccio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.