Legal Opinion

Landy v. Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1927No. 25,848PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff! appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding a verdict for $4,500.

Defendant operates a sash and door factory at the southeast corner of Bryant avenue and Twenty-ninth street, Minneapolis. The original frame part of the factory faces Twenty-ninth street. A new brick addition facing Bryant avenue contains defendant’s offices which are accessible from the avenue. The entrance from Twenty-ninth street consists of a small porch with steps, a balustrade on each side and a roof. This was the entrance to the offices prior to the construction of the new…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Hamilton v. Minneapolis Desk Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Ober v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Gilbert v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Avery v. Platte Valley Land & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hastings v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Murray v. Albert Lea Home Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. McIntyre v. HoltmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Carlson v. F. A. Martoccio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API