New Par v. City of Saginaw
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a provider of cellular telephone service, has filed this action under the Telecommunications Act of 1996(Act) seeking mandamus and injunctive relief from a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals for the City of Saginaw denying a variance which would have allowed the placement of a cellular telephone tower on property which the City’s zoning ordinance otherwise would not have permitted. The plaintiff contends that the denial violates the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MIOP, INC. v. City of Grand RapidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001