Legal Opinion

In re Amoun Vang Sayaovong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 2018No. A15-1320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition and supplementary petition for disciplinary action against respondent Amoun Vang Sayaovong, alleging six counts of misconduct that occurred in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Sayaovong did not file an answer to either petition. We accordingly deemed the allegations admitted and allowed the parties to file memoranda on the appropriate discipline. Sayaovong has not filed a memorandum or otherwise appeared in this matter. The Director asserts that the appropriate sanction is disbarment. We agree.

FACTS

Sayaovong was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against VillanuevaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  2. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against, Bradley J. Haddy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387503. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API