Legal Opinion

Prime Financial Group, Inc. v. Masters

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 16, 1996No. 94-403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiff, Prime Financial Group, Inc., appeals from an adverse jury verdict, arguing that the Superior Court *34(McGuire, J.) improperly instructed the jury in response to jury questions. We directed the parties to file memoranda addressing the issue of whether this appeal should be dismissed as untimely filed under Supreme Court Rule 7(1). We hold that the appeal was timely filed, and affirm.

The parties’ dispute arose out of a commercial equipment lease agreement and the attempted assignment of that lease. After the case was submitted to the jury, the jury posed two questions to the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Menard & Co. Masonry Building Contractors v. Marshall Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  3. Chellman v. Saab-Scania ABSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Xerox Corp. v. HawkesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. C.I.T. Corp. v. JonnetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. C9 Ventures v. SVC-West, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Cadle Co. v. BourgeoisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. Rockwood v. SKF USA INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
  4. In Re Chicago Investments, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. Lakeview v. Care Realty, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API