Legal Opinion

C9 Ventures v. SVC-West, L.P.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2012No. G044429PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

This case could serve as a question on a law school final examination for a course on the Uniform Commercial Code. As in a law school examination, the facts are undisputed. On July 3, 2007, SVC-West, L.P. (SVC), telephoned C9 Ventures (C9) and placed a rush order for eight helium-filled tanks used to inflate festive balloons. C9 accepted the order and later that day delivered the tanks without obtaining a signature on an invoice for them. On the reverse of the invoice was an indemnification provision requiring SVC to indemnify C9 for any loss arising out of the use…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology and the Software Link, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People ex rel. Strathmann v. Acacia Research Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Winchester Mystery House v. Global Asylum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. John Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API