Legal Opinion

Chellman v. Saab-Scania AB

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 17, 1993No. 92-429PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiffs, Jerildine and Chester E. Chellman, III, appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in a products liability case and from the Superior Court’s (Mohl, J.) denial of their motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. On appeal, the plaintiffs allege errors by the trial court in instructing the jury on the law of strict products liability and warranty. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

*76The automobile accident giving rise to this action occurred in April 1985 when Chester Chellman took his brother-in-law for a ride in his new Saab 900 Turbo SPG on Canaan…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  3. Reid v. Spadone MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Broderick v. WattsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Johnston v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mut. Pharm. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Scarfo v. Cabletron Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Vautour v. Body Masters Sports Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API