Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. Hawkes

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 1984No. 83-228PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C.J.

In this case we address the validity of contractual provisions contained in a service agreement between a lessor and a lessee. We hold, first, that the language of the agreement falls within the scope of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code; second, that there is no evidence indicating that the clauses in the agreement which exclude incidental and consequential damages are unconscionable; third, that the agreement’s disclaimer language is sufficiently conspicuous to meet the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code; and, fourth, that the agreement’s repair or replacement remedy does…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. County Asphalt, Inc. v. Lewis Welding & Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Collins Radio Co. of Dallas v. BellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Owens v. Patent Scaffolding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Canal Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  4. Cole Energy Development Company v. Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Cilley v. New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API