Holland v. Holland

I concur with the result of the opinion as written that the judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed; however, I would affirm for other additional reasons.

The husband’s first post-judgment motion, although styled “Rule 59 Motion,” sought relief from the judgment, alleging, inter alia, “newly discovered proof” and “misrepresentation.” The record reflects that following a hearing on that motion, the relief sought by the husband was partially granted. The husband’s second post-judgment motion, with its supporting affidavit, sought relief similar to the first post-judgment motion. The…