Boykin v. Magnolia Bay, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Louise and Ernest Boykin ("the parents"), individually and as next friends and parents of their minor daughter, Rhonya Boykin, filed a three-count complaint against defendants Magnolia Bay, Inc., d/b/a Family Planning Medical Center ("Family Planning"); Owen B. Evans, M.D.; Elaine Miller; and Dawn O'Donnell, all individually and as agents for Family Planning, arising from an abortion performed on Rhonya by Dr. Evans at Family Planning. Count I asserted a claim based on the tort of outrage, on behalf of the parents individually. Count II, a claim also based on the tort of outrage, was asserted…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Road Serv. Co. v. InmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Cates v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Empiregas, Inc., of Gadsden v. GearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- McGowan v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Kelly v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Steiger v. Huntsville City Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Pierce v. Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves & JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Surtees v. VFJ Ventures, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.