Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dowling

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1985No. 84-947PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Mobile Circuit Court in which petitioner requests that we order that court to vacate its grant of remittitur for the defendant/respondent James Purvis and reinstate its original judgment. We agree with plaintiff/petitioner Joseph Dowling that the court did not have authority to order the remittitur and, thus, we grant the writ.

Dowling originally sued Purvis for assault and battery, alleging that Purvis struck him several times in the face while Dowling sat in his car, causing serious bruises and lacerations. The jury returned a verdict in favor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Textron, Inc. v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Nunn v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Nowlin v. Druid City Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Ex Parte S. Palmer KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. State ex rel. G.J. v. W.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Adams v. FarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API