Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1983No. 81-745PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This medical malpractice case concerns an alleged ambiguity in the statute of limitations provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act. The Defendant appeals from the trial court's order overruling his motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The statute of limitations involved here, § 6-5-482 (a), Code of 1975, provides:

"(a) All actions against physicians, surgeons, dentists, medical institutions or other health care providers for liability, error, mistake or failure to cure, whether based on contract or tort, must be commenced within two years next after the act or omission or failure giving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Street v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Lankford v. Sullivan, Long & HagertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. PackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Bowlin Horn v. Citizens Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Ramey v. GuytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Maryland Cas. Co. v. TiffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Moore v. GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Jackson v. Mannesmann Demag Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API