Brummund v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
This appeal from a judgment granting petitioner a writ of mandate requiring the appellants to pay her a refund of certain moneys deducted from her late husband’s salary as a fireman of the city of Oakland and contributed to the firemen’s relief fund, raises the question of the proper interpretation of section 104 (2) of the Oakland city charter as amended in 1943.
Facts
There is no dispute as to the facts. Petitioner is the widow of Henry M. Brummund, who was a member of the fire department of the city of Oakland from January 1, 1920, continuously to the date of his death January 30, 1950. He…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McKeag v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Jorgensen v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Conrad v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Eichelberger v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Nelson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.