Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Panzarella

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1995No. 03360 and 03476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

The parties in this medical malpractice action present cross-appeals from the June 17, 1994 Order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial and denying their motions for judgment n.o.v. and remittitur. The trial court granted a new trial on the basis that it had improperly refused to direct a verdict in favor of defendants as to plaintiffs third claim, alleging negligent post-operative care.

The evidence educed at trial reveals that plaintiff, Lee E. Ferguson (plaintiff), sustained a knee injury and was treated by defendants, Marius H. Panzarella, M.D., and Geisinger Medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spang & Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Beechwoods Flying Service, Inc. v. Al Hamilton Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Chiaverini v. Sewickley Valley HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Gentile v. DevirgilisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tudor Insurance v. Township of StoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Diffenderfer v. StanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Ferguson v. PanzarellaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API