Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Panzarella

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1997No. 41 and 42 Middle District Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case involving claims of negligence in the performance of surgery and in post-operative care. The trial court granted the defendants a new trial, holding that under Gentile v. Devirgilis, 290 Pa. 50, 138 A. 540 (1927), the issue of negligent after-care should not have gone to the jury. The Superior Court affirmed, 445 Pa.Super. 23, 664 A.2d 989 (1995). We granted allocatur, 544 Pa. 609, 674 A.2d 1072 (1996), and now reverse.

The Appellant, Lee E. Ferguson, sustained a knee injury, a rupturing of the right quadriceps tendon, which connects…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCandless v. McWhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Gentile v. DevirgilisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Ferguson v. PanzarellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Diffenderfer v. StanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Alexander v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Alexander v. Univ Pgh Med Ctr SysCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Alexander v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Cole, M. v. Janoski, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API