Legal Opinion

Schenk v. Yosten

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1988No. 88-278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Kenneth Schenk and Cornhusker Casualty Company, the workers’ compensation carrier for Schenk’s employer, seek damages arising from a collision between a truck operated by Schenk and an automobile driven by defendant-appellee, Tom Yosten. Yosten in turn counterclaimed for the damages he sustained. Each of the parties then moved for summary judgment. The district court sustained each motion, thereby dismissing both the action brought by Schenk and Cornhusker Casualty and the counterclaim brought by Yosten. Schenk and Cornhusker Casualty appeal, assigning as error the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zeller v. County of HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Newman v. Hinky Dinky Omaha-Lincoln, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hodgson v. GlademNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Crink v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. School District of TecumsehNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Russell v. LuevanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Birchem v. EggersNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Stauffer v. School District of TecumsehNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API