Legal Opinion

Newman v. Hinky Dinky Omaha-Lincoln, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1988No. 86-765PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

This is a forcible entry and detainer action which resulted in a judgment of restitution of real estate to the plaintiff-lessor, Raquel H. Newman, trustee of the Calvin M. Newman and Raquel H. Newman Charitable Trust (Newman). See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-568 et seq. (Reissue 1985) (forcible entry and detainer). Hinky Dinky Omaha-Lincoln, Inc. (Hinky Dinky), the occupant and sublessee, appeals, thereby presenting to this court a question of first impression, namely: In the absence of an express lease provision specifically permitting a lessor to withhold consent to an assignment of the lease or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. Spanish Oaks, Inc. v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API