Glenn Tibble v. Edison International
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
Current and former beneficiaries sued their employer’s benefit plan administrator under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act charging that their pension plan had been managed imprudently and in a self-interested fashion. We must decide, among other issues, whether the Act’s limitations period or its safe harbor provision are obstacles to their suit.
I
A
Edison International is a holding company for various electric utilities and other energy interests including Southern California Edison Company and the Edison Mission Group (collectively “Edison”), which…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tibble v. Edison InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Terraza v. Safeway Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Kopp v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Yamauchi v. CottermanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Wildman v. Am. Century Servs., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.