Legal Opinion

Glenn Tibble v. Edison International

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2013No. 10-56406, 10-56415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

Current and former beneficiaries sued their employer’s benefit plan administrator under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act charging that their pension plan had been managed imprudently and in a self-interested fashion. We must decide, among other issues, whether the Act’s limitations period or its safe harbor provision are obstacles to their suit.

I

A

Edison International is a holding company for various electric utilities and other energy interests including Southern California Edison Company and the Edison Mission Group (collectively “Edison”), which…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tibble v. Edison InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Terraza v. Safeway Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Kopp v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Yamauchi v. CottermanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Wildman v. Am. Century Servs., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API